Pakistan Studies · May / June 2024 · Paper 11 · Question 4
0448
As printed in the paper
Show the answer and mark scheme
4(a)[4]
Describe the ‘One Unit’ Scheme.
Target: AO1
One mark for each relevant point. Additional mark for supporting detail. Indicative content
in 1954 (1) Muhammad Ali Bogra (1) had proposed that the four provinces and ten princely states within Pakistan should be joined together (1) to form West Pakistan (1)in 1955 (1) Iskander Mirza (1) passed an order unifying all West Pakistan in what became known as the ‘One Unit’ Scheme (1)Pakistan was divided into two wings, West and East PakistanMirza claimed that the unification would bring about greater efficiency (1) and a united country (1)Other relevant responses should also be credited.
4(b)[7]
Explain why East Pakistan sought independence from West Pakistan in 1971.
Target: AO1, AO2
Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 1.
Indicative content
East Pakistan felt that:
the long distance from West Pakistan meant it was not treated as an equal part of Pakistanthe government introduced schemes such as the ‘One Unit policy’ to deny East Pakistan fair representation in the Assemblycultural and linguistic differences were not fully recognisedit was under-represented in the Civil Service and the militarygovernment measures to boost the economy had favoured West Pakistanit did not benefit from the wealth created by the growing of jutethe wealth gap and differences in health and education were growingit received insufficient relief following the 1970 cyclonethe demands of the Awami League were not fully consideredthe results of the 1971 election were not acceptedOther relevant responses should also be credited.
Level of response, Table 1: used to mark the part (c) question in Section A and part (b) questions in Section B
Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation (AO1, AO2)
Level 3 (5–7 marks): Explanation
one explanation [5]two explanations or one developed explanation [6]additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [7]Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge
Level 2 (2–4 marks): Identification/ description
Identifies and/or describes using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge (1 mark per identification/ description)
Level 1 (1 mark): General answer
Valid general comment lacking specific knowledge
Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response
4(c)[14]
‘Pakistan has had good relations with China since 1947.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
Target: AO1, AO2
Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 2.
Indicative content
May agree that Pakistan has had good relations with China since 1947:
Pakistan gave support for China joining UN in 1952boundary issues between the two countries were settled in 1963trade developed in 1960s particularly Pakistani cotton – a $60 million long term interest free loan regarding import of machineryChina permitted PIA to use any airport in 1963, despite opposition from USAincreased numbers of visitors from China – journalists, engineers, scientists etc.China gave Pakistan full support during the 1965 war and military aidPost war in 1972 Bhutto visited China and supportive relations were reestablishedin 1978 Karakoram Highway provided the first road link and opened the two countries up to trade and tourismZia’s visit to China in 1986 and the signature of nuclear cooperation treaty emphasised the strength of the relationshipCounter-arguments might include:
the 1950s saw a cooling off when Pakistan supported pro-USA policiesthere was a border dispute in 1950sin 1958/9 Pakistan voted against China’s admission to UN and condemned military action in Tibetduring the 1971 war, China was unable to offer as much support to Pakistanduring 1990s China developed relations with other countriesOther relevant responses should also be credited.
Level of response, Table 2: used to mark the part (c) questions in Section B
Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation and an ability to analyse and evaluate historical events (AO1, AO2)
Level 5 (13–14 marks): Explanation with evaluation/ judgement
explanation at the top of Level 4 with an evaluation/ judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [13]explanation at the top of Level 4 with a developed evaluation/ judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [14]Level 4 (10–12 marks): Explanation of both sides of the issue
one explanation of each side of the issue [10]two explanations or one developed explanation of one-side of the issue and an explanation of the other side of the issue [11]additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) from either side of the issue [12]Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge
Level 3 (7–9 marks): Explanation of one-side of the issue
one explanation [7]two explanations or one developed explanation [8]additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [9]Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge
Level 2 (3–6 marks): Identification/ description of the issue
Identifies and/or describes the issue using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge (1 mark per identification/ description)
Level 1 (1–2 marks): General answer
Valid general comment(s) lacking specific subject knowledge (1 mark per general comment)
Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response
Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.

