Note AcademyNote Academy

Pakistan Studies · May / June 2024 · Paper 11 · Question 1

0448

As printed in the paper

The question as text

Study the sources (Insert) carefully and then answer the questions which follow. 1

Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.

Show the answer and mark scheme
  • 1(a)[3]

    According to Source A, Mir Qasim increased the tax revenue for Bengal. Identify three ways in which he did this.

    Target: AO4

    ‘by reducing the amount of rent-free land’
    ‘by increasing the rate of land tax’
    ‘he warned that anyone who refused to pay would be evicted’

    One mark for each relevant statement correctly identified from the source. Note: candidates may paraphrase but content must be derived from the bullet point statements above.

  • 1(b)[5]

    What message did Source B intend to give about the relationship between the East India Company and Shah Alam II?

    Target: AO1, AO4

    Level 3 (4–5 marks) Supported valid inference(s)

    one valid inference supported by a surface feature from source B [4]
    additional valid inference(s) supported by surface feature(s) from source B or one valid inference supported by a surface feature from source B and contextual knowledge [5]

    Level 2 (2–3 marks) Unsupported valid inference(s)

    one unsupported valid inference [2]
    additional unsupported valid inference(s) [3]

    Level 1 (1 mark) Identifies a surface feature Any correct surface feature taken from source B [1]

    Level 0 (0 marks) No creditable response

    Note: An unsupported valid inference can only be credited if it can be inferred directly from the source.

    Note: A response that does not refer to source B cannot be credited.

    Indicative content

    Surface feature

    Shah Alam II is in the centre of the picture (1) sitting on a stage/platform (1) raised from the crowd (1)
    representatives of the East India Company are dressed in red (1) and standing to his right/our left (1)
    a document is being exchanged between the two
    many people are present at the meeting
    there are flags/spears/weapons in the picture

    Valid inference (unsupported)

    the relationship is friendly/cordial/amicable/respectful
    the relationship is formal/ceremonial
    the relationship is based on treaties and documents/policies
    the relationship is based on discussion, negotiation and mutual agreement
    the relationship is based on equality/Shah Alam II has greater power in the relationship

    Contextual knowledge

    the British defeated Shah Alam II at the Battle of Buxar in 1764
    the British imposed the Diwani Treaty on Shah Alam II

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

  • 1(c)[7]

    Explain why the East India Company became involved in the

    subcontinent.

    Target: AO1, AO2

    Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 1.

    Indicative content

    because of the wealth in the subcontinent
    because other European countries were there
    Britain wanted a strategic port/base
    to set up trading posts
    to gain profits
    to access raw materials such as spices, indigo, cotton
    as an alternative to the spice trade in the East Indies dominated by the Dutch
    to set up a transit point for trade in China

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

    Level of response, Table 1: used to mark the part (c) question in Section A and part (b) questions in Section B

    Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation (AO1, AO2)

    Level 3 (5–7 marks): Explanation

    one explanation [5]
    two explanations or one developed explanation [6]
    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [7]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 2 (2–4 marks): Identification/ description

    Identifies and/or describes using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge (1 mark per identification/ description)

    Level 1 (1 mark): General answer

    Valid general comment lacking specific knowledge

    Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response

  • 1(d)[10]

    ‘Political factors, such as the Doctrine of Lapse, were more significant than economic factors in causing the War of Independence in 1857.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer. Target: AO1, AO2

    Level 5 (10 marks) Explains with evaluation/ judgement

    Explanation at the top of Level 4 with an evaluation/ judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 4 (7–9 marks) Explanation of both sides of the issue

    one explanation of each side of the issue [7]
    two explanations or one developed explanation of one-side of the issue and an explanation of the other side of the issue [8]
    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) from either side of the issue [9]
    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 3 (4–6 marks) Explanation of one-side of the issue

    one explanation [4]
    two explanations or one developed explanation [5]
    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [6] Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 2 (2–3 marks) Identification/ description of the issue

    Identifies and/or describes the issue using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge (1 mark per identification/ description)

    Level 1 (1 mark) General answer

    Valid general comment lacking specific subject knowledge

    Level 0 (0 marks) No creditable response

    Indicative content

    May agree that political measures such as the Doctrine of Lapse were the most significant cause of the War:

    the Doctrine of Lapse meant local kingdoms were administered by the British
    the taking of Oudh under British control in 1856 was unpopular with Indian people
    there was frustration at the lack of opportunities in the civil service
    the Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah and his family were mistreated
    the British replaced Persian with English as the official language of the administration/the language in which education would be given

    counter-arguments might include:

    the British kept the salary of sepoys low, was unpopular among the troops
    the British imposed high taxation that many Indians could not afford
    the East India Company banned the export of cotton goods from India in 1800
    poverty spread amongst the Indian people causing unrest

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.