Pakistan Studies · May / June 2022 · Paper 11 · Question 5
0448
As printed in the paper
Show the answer and mark scheme
5(a)[4]
Describe the provisions of the 1956 Constitution.
Target: AO1
One mark for each relevant point. Additional mark for supporting detail. Indicative content
it gave the title Islamic Republic of Pakistanthe President had to be 40 [1], could choose the Prime Minister [1], declare a state of emergency [1] and select the judges in the Supreme Court [1]it appointed a President [1] who had to be a Muslim [1], from the National Assembly [1], over 40 [1], had emergency powers [1] and could dissolve the National Assembly [1]there was a cabinet (advisory only) [1] and a National and Provincial Assembly [1 each]Other relevant responses should also be credited.
5(b)[7]
Explain the circumstances that brought General Pervez Musharraf into power in 1999.
Target: AO1, AO2
Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 1.
Indicative content
the government was severely weakened by economic, social and political problemsNawaz Sharif lost the support of the army because of his treatment of Jehangir Karamatthe government lost the support of the army because of events in Kashmiron General Pervez Musharraf’s return from a visit to Sri Lanka he announced that the army was taking control of the government of Pakistan Other relevant responses should also be credited.Level of response, Table 1: used to mark the part (c) question in Section A and part (b) questions in Section B
Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation (AO1, AO2)
Level 3 (5–7 marks): Explanation
one explanation [5]two explanations or one developed explanation [6]additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [7]Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge
Level 2 (2–4 marks): Identification/description
Identifies and/or describes using relevant and accurate contextual
knowledge (1 mark per identification/description)
Level 1 (1 mark): General answer
Valid general comment lacking specific knowledge
Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response
5(c)[14]
‘Pakistan has built good relations with Bangladesh since 1971.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
Target: AO1, AO2
Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 2.
Indicative content
May agree that Pakistan has built good relations with Bangladesh since 1971:
Pakistan officially recognised Bangladesh in 1974Zulfikar Ali Bhutto visited Bangladesh in 1974cooperation on trade, tourism and the media were negotiatedthe two countries exchanged ambassadorstrade between the two countries increased in the 1980sPakistan provided humanitarian aid to Bangladesh on several occasions in response to natural disastersstrong ties exist between the two countries as fellow Muslim nations counter-arguments might include:relations were strained in 1971, but improved over timeresettlement issues in 1971 over the return of people in each countrythere was a problem of reallocating assetscontinuing resettlement issues of the non-Bengali population inBangladesh
Pakistan withdrew from the Commonwealth in 1972 in protest at British recognition of BangladeshOther relevant responses should also be credited.
Level of response, Table 2: used to mark the part (c) questions in Section B
Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation and an ability to analyse and evaluate historical events (AO1, AO2)
Level 5 (13–14 marks): Explanation with evaluation/judgement
explanation at the top of Level 4 with an evaluation/judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [13]explanation at the top of Level 4 with a developed evaluation/ judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [14]Level 4 (10–12 marks): Explanation of both sides of the issue
one explanation of each side of the issue [10]two explanations or one developed explanation of one side of the issue and an explanation of the other side of the issue [11]additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) from either side of the issue [12]Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge
Level 3 (7–9 marks): Explanation of one side of the issue
one explanation [7]two explanations or one developed explanation [8]additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [9]Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge
Level 2 (3–6 marks): Identification/description of the issue
Identifies and/or describes the issue using relevant and accurate contextual
knowledge (1 mark per identification/description)
Level 1 (1–2 marks): General answer
Valid general comment(s) lacking specific subject knowledge (1 mark per
general comment)
Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response
Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.

