Note AcademyNote Academy

Pakistan Studies · Oct / Nov 2020 · Paper 11 · Question 3

0448

As printed in the paper

Show the answer and mark scheme
  • 3(a)[4]

    Describe the Hijrat Movement.

    Target: AO1

    One mark for each relevant point. Additional mark for supporting detail. Indicative content

    it was a religious protest [1] against the British government [1]
    Islamic leaders told their followers to leave dar-ul-harb [1] and move to an Islamic state [1]
    it took place in (August) 1920 [1] during the Khilafat Movement [1]
    it involved 18000–20000 people [1] migrating to Afghanistan
    Muslim people sold their homes/farms and packed up their possessions
    Muslim emigrants were told that the Afghan government would welcome them [1] but the Afghan government was not welcoming [1]
    the migrants were refused entry [1] and were forcibly sent back by the Afghan government [1]
    many migrants died on the return journey

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

  • 3(b)[7]

    Explain why there were three Round Table Conferences between 1930 and 1932.

    Target: AO1, AO2

    Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 1.

    Indicative content

    to decide the future of the subcontinent
    to review the Simon Commission’s report
    Congress did not attend the first conference
    Gandhi and Lord Irwin held talks
    there was stalemate in the second conference
    Gandhi was stubborn
    Gandhi refused to recognise the rights of minority groups
    Gandhi refused to accept Jinnah’s 14 Points

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

    Level of response, Table 1: used to mark the part (c) question in Section A and part (b) questions in Section B

    Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation (AO1, AO2)

    Level 3 (5–7 marks): Explanation

    one explanation [5]

    two explanations or one developed explanation [6]

    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [7]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 2 (2–4 marks): Identification/description

    Identifies and/or describes using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    (1 mark per identification/description)

    Level 1 (1 mark): General answer

    Valid general comment lacking specific knowledge

    Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response

  • 3(c)[14]

    To what extent was Direct Action Day more significant in the creation of Pakistan than other key events of the 1940s? Explain your answer. Target: AO1, AO2

    Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 2.

    Indicative content

    May agree that Direct Action Day was more significant in the creation of Pakistan than other key events of the 1940s:

    it was organised by the Muslim League in 1946
    the Muslim League was concerned about the British leaving India leaving Congress in charge
    it aimed to show solidarity of the Muslim community and indicate Muslim strength to the British and Congress
    there were large-scale riots and nearly 4000 people killed
    the British became worried about the possibility of a civil war
    it led to a gradual change of mind over partition

    Counter-arguments might include:

    the Lahore Resolution 1940
    the Cripps Mission 1942 promised independence for India after WW2
    the Quit India Resolution 1942
    the Gandhi-Jinnah talks in 1944
    Congress and the Muslim League did not reach an agreement at the Simla Conference in 1945
    the elections of 1946 gave huge gains to the Muslim League
    the Cabinet Mission Plan in 1946 resulted in an interim government
    the 3 June Plan of 1947 announcing the partition of the subcontinent and transfer of power

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

    Level of response, Table 2: used to mark the part (c) questions in Section B

    Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation and an ability to analyse and evaluate historical events (AO1, AO2)

    Level 5 (13–14 marks): Explanation with evaluation/judgement

    explanation at the top of Level 4 with an evaluation/judgement supported

    by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [13]

    explanation at the top of Level 4 with a developed evaluation/judgement

    supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [14]

    Level 4 (10–12 marks): Explanation of both sides of the issue

    one explanation of each side of the issue [10]

    two explanations or one developed explanation of one side of the issue

    and an explanation of the other side of the issue [11]

    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) from either side

    of the issue [12]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 3 (7–9 marks): Explanation of one side of the issue

    one explanation [7]

    two explanations or one developed explanation [8]

    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [9]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 2 (3–6 marks): Identification/description of the issue

    Identifies and/or describes the issue using relevant and accurate contextual

    knowledge (1 mark per identification/ description)

    Level 1 (1–2 marks): General answer

    Valid general comment(s) lacking specific subject knowledge (1 mark per

    general comment)

    Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.