Note AcademyNote Academy

Pakistan Studies · May / June 2020 · Paper 11 · Question 3

0448

As printed in the paper

Show the answer and mark scheme
  • 3(a)[4]

    Who was General Dyer?

    Level 1: One mark for each relevant point, two marks for a developed statement.

    1–4 e.g.

    A British commander;
    Following demonstrations in Amritsar [1], in early 1919 [1], he moved troops there to restore order following riots [1];
    On April 13th [1] he ordered the troops to confront a peaceful gathering of thousands of people [1] in the Jallianwala Bagh/public park [1]
    The troops opened fire killing many people;
    Dyer was later removed from command because of his cruel actions. No evidence submitted or response does not address the question. 0
  • 3(b)[7]

    Explain why the Khilafat Movement ended in 1924.

    Level 3: Explains reason(s)

    5–7 (Five marks for one explanation, six marks for two explanations, seven marks for three explanations)

    e.g.

    Gandhi called off his support for The Khilafat Movement following the Chauri Chaura incident causing Muslim and Hindu groups to stop working together to further the Movement, weakening it;
    In 1920 many Muslim people set off on a hijrat to Afghanistan, but the Afghan government did not welcome them as they had expected. The migrants returned home to find their property and jobs occupied which reduced their interest in supporting the Movement as it was more important for them to get their lives back to normal;
    The new Turkish leader, Kemal Ataturk exiled the Khalifa, and abolished the institution of the Caliph in 1924 which ended the Movement.

    Level 2: Identifies reasons

    2–4 (One mark for each identification)

    e.g.

    Gandhi withdrew his support for the Khilafat Movement;
    Kemal Ataturk abolished the Caliph;
    The hijrat to Afghanistan weakened its support.

    Level 1: Simple statement

    1 (One mark for any simple statement)

    e.g.

    The movement created strong anti-British feeling.

    No evidence submitted or response does not address the question. 0

  • 3(c)[14]

    How successful was the 1905 Partition of Bengal? Explain your answer.

    Level 5: Explains with evaluation

    14 (As top of Level 4 plus judgement / evaluation)

    Level 4: Explains the success AND lack of success of Partition in 1905 9–13 (Two explanations, one on the achievements and one on another reason, are worth nine marks. Additional explanations awarded up to 13 marks) e.g.

    Success

    Bengal was the largest province in India. 54 million people were Hindu, out of a population of 84 million. The province had become too large and complex for the British to govern;
    Two smaller provinces were more efficient for the British to administer;
    The Muslim community were pleased. After partition they were fully recognised in East Bengal province where they were the majority;
    The separation of Bengal along religious lines ended the oppression of Muslims under Hindu rule.

    Lack of success

    Bengali Hindu groups objected. They believed that the partition was a deliberate British policy to ‘divide and rule’. Hindus believed that partition would weaken Hindu unity and influence in East Bengal;
    Many Hindus protested. The Hindu’s demands put pressure on the British government to reverse their decision.
    There was also an attempted assassination of Lord Minto.
    British goods were boycotted under the ‘Swadeshi Movement’ which ultimately succeeded.

    Level 3: Explains success OR lack of success of Partition in 1905 7–10 (One explanation is worth seven marks. Additional explanations awarded up to 10 marks)

    See exemplars on L4

    Level 2: Identifies/describes success OR lack of success of Partition in 1905.

    3–6 (One identification/description is worth three marks. Extra marks are awarded for additional identification/descriptions up to six marks) e.g.

    Partition did not succeed because it was reversed in 1911 after sustained objections by Hindu groups.

    Level 1: Simple statement(s)

    1–2 e.g.

    The Muslim community in Bengal wanted Partition.

    No evidence submitted or response does not address the question 0

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.