Global Perspectives · May / June 2023 · Paper 12 · Question 4
2069
As printed in the paper
The question as text
‘Living on your own is better than living within a family.’ Do you agree with this statement? In your answer, you should: • state your opinion • give reasons and evidence to support your opinion • use the material in the sources and/or any of your own ideas • consider different arguments and perspectives.
Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.
Show the answer and mark scheme
‘Living on your own is better than living within a family.’
Do you agree with this statement?
In your answer, you should:
state your opinion
give reasons and evidence to support your opinion
use the material in the sources and/or any of your own ideas •
consider different arguments and perspectives.
Main Annotations J
Indicative content
Candidates are expected to make a judgement about the statement using reasons and evidence to justify their opinion.
Candidates may use and develop the material found in Sources 1 to 4 but should go beyond simply repeating or recycling without
adaptation/interpretation. Other material may be introduced but is not necessary to gain full marks.
Candidates may consider some of the following:
reference to impact of living alone on relationships generally
importance of personal choice in lifestyle
health implications
employment and career implications
ethical or moral issues
reference to different consequences and implications for
individuals/different age groups/government
the influence of individuals and groups on other people
potential conflicts of interest within the wider family
greater vulnerability to crime and harm
other reasonable response.
The following levels of response should be used to award marks: Level 5 (20–24 marks) Very good response
Clear, well-supported and credible reasoning about the statement. Different arguments and perspectives are clearly considered.
The response usually contains a wide range of clearly reasoned points and/or evidence to support the views expressed, with four (or more) developed points, and some undeveloped points.
The response is very well-structured and a clear judgement is reached.
Level 4 (15–19 marks) Good response
Clear, supported and credible reasoning about the statement. Different arguments and perspectives are considered.
The response usually contains a range of reasoned points and/or evidence to support the views expressed, with three (or more) developed points, and some undeveloped points.
The response is generally well-structured and a judgement is reached. Level 3 (10–14 marks) Reasonable response
Some supported reasoning about the statement. Different arguments and perspectives are included.
The response usually contains some points and/or evidence to support the views expressed, with two (or more) developed points, and some undeveloped points.
The response is structured but at times difficult to follow. Some attempt is made to give an overall judgement.
Level 2 (5–9 marks) Basic response
Basic reasoning about the statement. Different arguments are included; perspectives, if present, are unclear.
The response relies on assertion rather than evidence but usually contains one (or more) developed point(s) or a range of undeveloped points. The response lacks structure and is difficult to follow. A basic judgement may be attempted.
Level 1 (1–4 marks) Limited response
Limited and unsupported reasoning about the topic in general. Different arguments may be included.
Level 0 (0 marks)
No relevant response or creditworthy material.
Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.

