Global Perspectives · May / June 2023 · Paper 12 · Question 3
2069
As printed in the paper
The question as text
Study Source 4.
Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.
Show the answer and mark scheme
3(a)[2]
Identify one value judgement from Arthit’s statement. Explain why it is a value judgement.
Main Annotations
A value judgement is a view or decision about what is right, wrong or important, based a particular set of standards, principles, or values. Candidates may identify one of the following value judgements from Arthit’s statement:
It is not right to expect the government to look after you.
She thinks families should care for each other (grandmother). Award 1 mark for identifying a value judgement.
Award 1 mark for a response that demonstrates a clear understanding of a value judgement. [This mark may be awarded even if the value judgement is incorrect.]
Further guidance – the only acceptable answers are listed above. However, candidates may use their own words.
3(b)(i)[1]
Malee argues that living alone has many benefits.
Identify one fact from Malee’s statement.
Main Annotations
A fact is a statement that is true, correct, accurate or can be proven/verified. Candidates may identify one of the following facts from Malee’s statement: •
Malee enjoys living on her own
Malee wants to live on her own
Malee wants freedom to choose her lifestyle
Malee is buying an affordable apartment designed for single people •
Malee’s friend Anna has chosen to be single to pursue her career and get promotion
Malee’s flat in the city is surrounded by other people and there is a gym and club in her block
research studies by psychologists in 2019 in the United States show that living alone does not cause loneliness
you can speak to your family on social media.
Malee’s friend thinks that long hours and dedication to work make marriage difficult
other reasonable response.
1 mark should be awarded for identifying one of the above.
Further guidance – the only acceptable answers are listed above. However, candidates may use their own words.
3(b)(ii)[2]
Explain how well this fact supports Malee’s argument.
Main Annotations
Examples of the points that could be made when explaining how well the fact supports the argument:
Very good support as the fact is based on evidence from research or experience that gives confidence to the reader about the claim. •
Some support as the fact is relevant to the argument but the fact alone is not much evidence and so may not be relied upon or be sufficient to prove the case.
Limited support as the fact is not relevant and the research is not cited. Use the following levels of response to award a maximum of two marks: Level 2 (2 marks) Good response
An example of a fact is identified correctly in Q3(b)(i). Some explanation of the relationship of the fact to the argument. Some evaluation of the use of the fact in the argument.
Level 1 (1 marks) Reasonable response
An example of a fact is identified correctly in Q3(b)(i). Some explanation of the relationship of the fact to the argument.
Level 0 (0 marks)
No relevant response or creditworthy material.
Further guidance – Q3(b)(i) must be answered correctly to be awarded marks for this question. It is expected that responses will be very brief and not developed.
3(c)[15]
Which argument is more convincing, Arthit’s or Malee’s?
Your answer should consider both arguments, and you should support your point of view with their words.
You should also consider:
the strength of their reasoning and evidence
their use of language
the different types of information used.
Main Annotations
Indicative content
Candidates are expected to evaluate the arguments presented in Source 4 and compare their effectiveness. They should make a supported judgement with some explanation about which person has the most convincing argument.
Candidates may support their judgement by considering:
Strength of reasoning:
logic
structure
balance
claims
Use of language:
tone – emotive, exaggerated, precise
clarity
Evidence:
range of information and depth
relevance
sufficiency – sample
source – media; internet
date – how recent
different types of information – fact, opinion, value, anecdote •
testimony – from experience and expert
Sources of bias
local interest
economic
personal values
experience
Likely consequences of the ideas presented
Acceptability of their values to others:
how likely other people are to agree with their perspective/view The following levels of response should be used to award marks: Level 5 (13–15 marks) Very good response
Clear, credible and well-supported points/explanation about which argument is more convincing. Coherent, structured evaluation of both arguments with clear comparison.
The response usually contains three (or more) developed evaluative points and may include some undeveloped points. Material from the sources is used as evidence to support the evaluation; clear reference to the evidence and/or arguments in the source e.g. quotation/summary of ideas. A clear judgement is reached.
Level 4 (10–12 marks) Good response
Clear, supported points/explanation about which argument is more convincing. Evaluation of both arguments, with comparison.
The response usually contains two (or more) developed evaluative points and may include some undeveloped points. A wide range (four or more) of undeveloped but clearly appropriate points may be sufficient to enter this band at the lower level.
Material from the sources is used as evidence to support the evaluation; some reference to the evidence and/or arguments in the source e.g. quotation/summary of ideas.
A judgment is reached.
Level 3 (7–9 marks) Reasonable response
Reasonable points/explanation about which argument is more convincing. Some evaluation of both arguments, with an attempt at comparison or very good evaluation of only one argument. Some judgements and evaluative points are partially supported or asserted.
Usually one (or more) developed evaluative points, possibly with some undeveloped points; three (or more) undeveloped points may be sufficient to enter this band at the lower level.
Some material from the sources may be used as evidence to support the evaluation. The response may occasionally lack some clarity and be difficult to follow.
An attempt is made to give an overall judgement.
Level 2 (4–6) Basic response
Basic points about which argument is more convincing. There may be only one argument considered in any detail, with little attempt at comparison. Judgements and evaluative points are partially supported and lack clarity/relevance at times.
The response usually contains two (or more) undeveloped points. A basic judgement may be reached.
Level 1 (1–3 marks) Limited response
Limited and unsupported points about which argument is more convincing. The response considers the arguments briefly and/or tangentially. There is little clarity. Answers at this level may repeat source material with little understanding or simply agree/disagree with the arguments presented. The response may not contain any clear evaluative points.
Level 0 (0 marks)
No relevant response or creditworthy material.
Further Guidance- responses that give a very good evaluation of only one argument may achieve Level 3 but no higher.
Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.