Note AcademyNote Academy

Pakistan Studies · May / June 2025 · Paper 11 · Question 2

0448

As printed in the paper

Show the answer and mark scheme
  • 2(a)[4]

    Describe the military achievements of Titu Mir.

    Target: AO1

    One mark for each relevant point. Additional mark for supporting detail. Indicative content

    Titu Mir led the people against the zamindars (1) and the British/colonial system (1)
    he had success in freeing Bengal from un-Islamic practices
    he raised an army of 15 000 followers (1)
    he built a bamboo fort at Narkelbaria (1) in October 1831 (1) and defeated British forces sent to destroy it (1)
    Titu Mir’s forces held off the British army for five days of fighting
    he trained his followers in fighting skills
    his army fought successfully without modern weapons

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

  • 2(b)[7]

    Explain why Aurangzeb’s successors faced challenges as rulers. Target: AO1, AO2

    Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 1.

    Indicative content

    internal rebellions exposed weaknesses in the governance of the Empire
    in-fighting between wealthy Mughal royal families
    the absence of a definite line of succession
    succession disputes wasted money/eroded the Empire
    foreign attacks by the Persians/Marathas/Afghans were difficult to stop
    the size of the Empire made it difficult to administer and incurred huge military costs

    Other relevant responses should also be credited.

    Level of response, Table 1: used to mark the part (c) question in Section A and part (b) questions in Section B

    Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation (AO1, AO2)

    Level 3 (5–7 marks): Explanation

    one explanation [5]
    two explanations or one developed explanation [6]
    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [7]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 2 (2–4 marks): Identification/description

    Identifies and/or describes using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge (1 mark per identification/description)

    Level 1 (1 mark): General answer

    Valid general comment lacking specific knowledge

    Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response

  • 2(c)[14]

    ‘Educational changes rather than economic policies led to Indian opposition to the British during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.

    Target: AO1, AO2

    Mark according to the level of response descriptors in Table 2.

    Indicative content

    May agree that the introduction of educational changes resulted in Indian opposition to the British:

    Indians had to send their children to co-educational schools
    Christian missionaries taught Christianity in schools
    English became the official language and was taught in schools counter-arguments might include:
    the British imposed high taxation especially on peasants and small landowners
    sepoy salaries were very low in comparison with British soldiers
    the East India Company banned the export of cotton from India in 1800
    the British encouraged cheap, mass-produced goods to be sold in India Other relevant responses should also be credited.

    Level of response, Table 2: used to mark the part (c) questions in Section B

    Target: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the past through historical explanation and an ability to analyse and evaluate historical events (AO1, AO2)

    Level 5 (13–14 marks): Explanation with evaluation/judgement

    explanation at the top of Level 4 with an evaluation/judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [13]
    explanation at the top of Level 4 with a developed evaluation/judgement supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge [14]

    Level 4 (10–12 marks): Explanation of both sides of the issue

    one explanation of each side of the issue [10]
    two explanations or one developed explanation of one-side of the issue and an explanation of the other side of the issue [11]
    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) from either side of the issue [12]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 3 (7–9 marks): Explanation of one-side of the issue

    one explanation [7]
    two explanations or one developed explanation [8]
    additional explanation(s) and/or developed explanation(s) [9]

    Supported by relevant and accurate contextual knowledge

    Level 2 (3–6 marks): Identification/description of the issue

    Identifies and/or describes the issue using relevant and accurate contextual knowledge (1 mark per identification/description)

    Level 1 (1–2 marks): General answer

    Valid general comment(s) lacking specific subject knowledge (1 mark per general comment)

    Level 0 (0 marks): No creditable response

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.