Global Perspectives · May / June 2026 · Paper 12 · Question 4

2069

As printed in the paper

The question as text

A government wants to reduce the amount of vehicle crime. The following actions are being considered: • Provide more police to prevent vehicle crime. • Fund a national vehicle crime awareness campaign. • Encourage manufacturers to improve vehicle security. Which one of these actions would you recommend to the government, and why? In your answer, you should: • state your recommendation • give reasons and evidence to support your choice • use the material in the sources and/or any of your own ideas • consider different arguments and perspectives.

Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.

Show the answer and mark scheme

A government wants to reduce the amount of vehicle crime.

The following actions are being considered:

Provide more police to prevent vehicle crime.

Fund a national vehicle crime awareness campaign.

Encourage manufacturers to improve vehicle security.

Which one of these actions would you recommend to the government, and why?

In your answer, you should:

state your recommendation

give reasons and evidence to support your choice

use the material in the sources and/or any of your own ideas

consider different arguments and perspectives.

Main Annotations

Tables G, H and I

Use these tables to give marks for each candidate response.

Table G

Use evidence and reasons to support arguments

(AO1)

Level Description

7–8 Effective use of evidence and reasons to support

arguments

Uses a wide range of evidence and reasons to fully

support the candidate’s argument.

Evidence and reasons are clearly relevant to the issue in the question.

5–6 Mainly uses evidence and reasons to support

arguments

Uses a range of evidence and reasons to support the candidate’s argument.

Evidence and reasons are relevant to the issue in the question.

3–4 Some use of evidence and reasons to support

arguments

Uses a limited range of evidence and reasons to partly support the candidate’s argument.

Evidence and reasons are not always relevant to the issue in the question.

Use evidence and reasons to support arguments

(AO1)

Level Description

1–2 Limited use of evidence and reasons to support

arguments

Uses one or two pieces of evidence and/or reasons

and these give very little support the candidate’s

argument.

Evidence and reasons are tangential or not relevant to the issue in the question.

No creditable response

0 Table H

Develop a line of reasoning (AO1)

Level Description

7–8 Convincing and clear reasoning

Clear, convincing and sustained lines of reasoning

related to the issue in the question and the

candidate’s argument.

Well-structured and explicit consideration of different perspectives or actions.

5–6 Clear reasoning

Clear lines of reasoning mainly related to the issue in the question and the candidate’s argument.

Structured consideration of different perspectives or

actions.

3–4 Some reasoning

Lines of reasoning are difficult to follow at times and

not always related to the issue in the question and the candidate’s argument.

Some consideration of different perspectives or

actions.

1–2 Limited reasoning

Lines of reasoning lack clarity and are often unrelated to the issue in the question and the candidate’s

argument.

Little or no consideration of different perspectives or

actions.

No creditable response

Table I

Judgements about perspectives and action (AO1)

Level Description

Judgements are fully supported

Judgements are clearly related to the issue, clearly

explained and consistent with the candidate’s

argument.

Judgements are supported

Judgements are related to the issue, explained and

consistent with the candidate’s argument.

Judgements are partly supported

Judgements are partly related to the issue, partly

explained and not consistent with the candidate’s

argument.

Asserted judgements

Judgements are asserted and not explained.

No creditable response

0 Indicative Content

Candidates are expected to make a judgement about the recommended courses of action using reasons and evidence to justify their choice. Candidates may use and develop material found in Sources 1 to 4 but should go beyond simply repeating or recycling without interpretation. Other material may be introduced but is not necessary to gain full marks.

Candidates may consider some of the following:

Reference to scale of impact on reducing vehicle crime – number of people affected / range of places or organisations.

Reference to different consequences and implications for different individuals/groups/organisations.

Timescale and how long it might take to make a difference.

Barriers to change which make actions difficult to achieve.

The power of collective action, e.g. cooperation between different organisations or countries over international crime and profiteering issues.

The influence of individuals and groups on decision making or the issue, particularly business leaders, criminal gangs, law enforcement and police, politicians.

The role of bias, vested interests and power differences.

Potential conflicts of interest and political implications, e.g. protest.

Difficulties in planning and coordinating action.

Cost and access to resources to implement change; for example, by raising taxes.

Opportunity costs of funding actions and a focus on the issue of crime; for example, taking away resources/money for other aspects of society.

Other reasonable response.

AO1 Use evidence and reasons to support arguments.

AO1 Develop a line of reasoning.

AO1 Judgements about perspectives and action.

Practise this paper →

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.