2(a) Explain the strengths and weaknesses of the research outlined in Source 3. Main Annotations Table C Use this table to give marks for each candidate response. Evaluate research into current global issues (AO1) Level Description 7–8 4 Consistently evaluative Reasoned explanation of a wide range…

Global Perspectives · May / June 2026 · Paper 12 · Question 2

2069

As printed in the paper

The question as text

Study Source 3.

Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.

Show the answer and mark scheme

2(a)[8]
Explain the strengths and weaknesses of the research outlined in Source 3.
Main Annotations
Table C
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response.
Evaluate research into current global issues (AO1)
Level Description
7–8 4
Consistently evaluative
Reasoned explanation of a wide range of evaluative
points, including both strengths and weaknesses.
Explanations are credible, supported and clearly
related to the purpose of the research.
5–6 3
Mainly evaluative
Explanation of a range of evaluative points.
Explanations are mostly supported, credible and
related to the purpose of the research.
3–4 2
Partly evaluative
A range of evaluative points that are mostly
descriptive with little explanation.
Explanations are partially supported and may lack
some credibility or partly related to the purpose of the research.
1–2 1
Limited evaluation
A limited range of evaluative points without
explanation; the research or topic in the source is only described.
Evaluative points are asserted and/or not credible
and/or not related to the purpose of the research.
0
No creditable response
0 Indicative content
Candidates may identify the following strengths and weaknesses of the research.
Strengths:
Clear purpose of research which guides and directs the use of methods and gathering of relevant evidence; keeps the research on track and focused.
The researcher has a background in law which might enable them to understand the issue.
Research was ethical – permission was sought and given by the manager; confidentiality agreed.
Primary research that is likely to produce relevant and accurate data.
Interviews enable the research to gather qualitative data about personal experience, opinions and understandings.
The interview was recorded so that data would be accurate and not lost.
Research based on authentic personal testimony and experience of crime.
Other relevant response.
Weaknesses:
No clearly stated research question so the research may lose focus and direction.
A building firm may not be a representative type of company/organisation for the research topic on vehicle crime / theft.
Only one research method (interviews) – so triangulation/checking/ verification of data or results was difficult or did not take place.
The interview took place in noisy café where it was difficult to hear the interviewee so data may not be complete or accurate.
Small sample size of only one person/company may not be typical and representative.
Interviewee may be biased or have lack of knowledge or a vested interest that makes data unbalanced/untypical/exaggerated/generalised.
Presence of other people in the café may influence the responses of the interviewee – lack of confidentiality.
Other relevant response.
2(b)[8]
‘The amount of vehicle crime is increasing nationally.’
Explain how this claim could be tested. You should consider the research methods and evidence that could be used.
Main Annotations
Table D
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response.
Design research into current global issues (AO1)
Level Description
7–8 4
An appropriate and fully justified research design
Reasoned explanation of a wide range of methods
and evidence.
Explanations are credible and clearly related to testing the claim/purpose of the research.
5–6 3
An appropriate and justified research design
Explanation of a range of methods and evidence.
Explanations are credible and mostly related to testing the claim/purpose of the research.
3–4 2
A partly justified research design
A range of methods and/or evidence that are mostly
descriptive with little explanation.
Explanations may lack some credibility and/or are
partly related to testing the claim/purpose of the
research.
1–2 1
Limited research design
A limited range of methods and/or evidence without
explanation; the research or topic is only described.
Methods and evidence are not credible and/or not
related to testing the claim/purpose of the research. 0
No creditable response
0 Indicative content
Candidates may discuss the following ways to test the claim stated in Source 3.
Methods:
Interviews of relevant experts / victims of crime / criminals with ability to know / have experience of vehicle crime.
Surveys of relevant groups of people, e.g. public, police, car dealers, vehicle manufacturers.
Review of secondary sources/literature/research/documents.
Internet and media searches.
Questionnaires (e.g. online, postal).
Case studies of people or businesses that have experienced vehicle crime to provide detailed information.
Observation of areas where vehicle crime is common, perhaps using video filming.
Other relevant response.
Evidence:
Statistics/information on national vehicle crime and trends.
Individual testimony or personal experience to understand personal experience and feelings.
Material/documentary evidence from police authorities, insurance companies, government data that is likely to be relevant/professionally and scientifically researched/accurate.
Material/documentary evidence from pressure groups/charities/ governments/national organisations concerned about vehicle crime.
Primary and secondary research data/information/reports related to the issue/claim.
Quantitative and qualitative research data and information related to the issue/claim.
Other relevant response.

Practise this paper →

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.