Note AcademyNote Academy

Global Perspectives · May / June 2023 · Paper 11 · Question 1

0457

As printed in the paper

The question as text

Study Sources 1 to 3.

Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.

Show the answer and mark scheme
  • 1(a)[1]

    From Source 1, identify the trend in the number of people in the world without access to electricity.

    Main Annotations

    Candidates should identify the following trend from Source 1:

    Decreasing or going down or similar.

    1 mark should be awarded for identifying the above.

    Further guidance – the only acceptable answer is listed above. However, candidates may use their own words.

  • 1(b)[2]

    From Source 2, identify two consequences of energy poverty. Main Annotations

    Candidates may identify the following consequences from source 2:

    Cooking with fire causes indoor air pollution and disease.
    Living is harder without cold food storage, washing machines and light at night.
    Heating with firewood causes deforestation and environmental damage.
    Communication and entertainment with computers and television is impossible.
    Teaching and learning activities are limited without electricity.
    Economic development is much slower.

    1 mark should be awarded for each correctly identified benefit.

    Further guidance – the only acceptable answers are listed above. However, candidates may use their own words.

  • 1(c)[3]

    Which consequence of energy poverty do you think is the most significant? Explain why.

    Main Annotations

    Indicative content

    Candidates may identify one of the following consequences:

    Cooking with fire causes indoor air pollution and disease.
    Living is harder without cold food storage, washing machines and light at night.
    Heating with firewood causes deforestation and environmental damage.
    Communication and entertainment with computers and television is impossible.
    Teaching and learning activities are limited without electricity.
    Economic development is much slower.

    Candidates may give the following reasons, any of which could be used, to justify their choice:

    has greatest impact locally, nationally or globally
    affects most people
    ethically or morally most problematic
    has multiple negative consequences
    creates spiral of problems
    other reasonable response.

    Further guidance – candidates are most likely to discuss consequences from Source 2 as listed above. However, the assessment is focused mainly upon their reasoning / justification and therefore additional benefits should be credited.

    The following levels of response should be used to award marks: Level 3 (3 marks) Good response

    Clearly reasoned explanation explicitly linked to a benefit.

    Level 2 (2 marks) Reasonable response

    Some explanation. The link between the explanation and a benefit may be implicit / unclear at times.

    Level 1 (1 mark) Limited response

    A benefit is identified. There may be some limited explanation.

    Level 0 (0 marks)

    No relevant response or creditworthy material.

  • 1(d)[6]

    Explain why energy poverty is an important personal issue.

    Main Annotations

    Indicative content

    Candidates are likely to identify the following reasons:

    it affects people individually e.g. health; access to education
    affects the family and neighbourhood
    spoils the local environment
    makes life harder
    prevents access to modern technology e.g. computers and social media
    getting a job is more difficult as the local economy is affected negatively
    other reasonable response.

    The following levels of response should be used to award marks. Level 3 (5–6 marks) Good response

    Clearly reasoned, credible and structured explanation; usually two (or more) developed arguments clearly linked to the issue; or three (or more) undeveloped reasons. The personal dimension is explicit.

    Level 2 (3–4 marks) Reasonable response

    Some reasoned explanation; usually one (or more) developed argument(s) with some link to the issue, but may be implicit at times; or two (or more) undeveloped reasons. The personal dimension is implicit at times. Level 1 (1–2 marks) Limited response

    Limited reasoning and explanation; the response is likely to contain only simple, undeveloped and asserted points. Arguments are partial, generalised and lack clarity. The personal dimension is implicit or not apparent.

    Level 0 (0 marks)

    No relevant response or creditworthy material.

Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.