Global Perspectives · May / June 2020 · Paper 11 · Question 1
0457
As printed in the paper
The question as text
Study Sources 1 to 3.
Read automatically from the paper; the printed page above is exact.
Show the answer and mark scheme
1(a)[1]
Candidates may identify one of the following reasons from Source 1:
Earn money.Pay for things.Better lifestyle.Make contribution to society.Help others.Have a fulfilling career.To make a difference.Meet people make friends.Enjoy social side of employment.1 mark should be awarded for identifying one of the above reasons. Further guidance – the only acceptable answers are listed above. However, candidates may use their own words.
1(b)[2]
Candidates may identify the following consequences from Source 2:
Better quality of work.Higher productivity.Increased profits.Lower staff turnover.Better attendance.Less conflict with workers.Greater loyalty.1 mark should be awarded for each correctly identified consequence up to a maximum of 2 marks.
Further guidance – the only acceptable answers are listed above. However, candidates may use their own words.
1(c)[3]
Indicative content
Candidates may identify one of the following consequences:
Workers work harder.Workers are more motivated.Workers are happier.Workers have more self-esteem.Workers have better health.Workers have better relationships.Workers have improved careers.Better quality of work.Higher productivity.Increased profits.Lower staff turnover.Better attendance.Less conflict with workers.Greater loyalty.Candidates may give the following reasons, any of which could be used, to justify their choice:
Has greatest impact.Affects most people.Ethically or morally most acceptable.Helps the company meet goals and targets.Increases profits.Increases personal well-being.Increases self-esteem.Helps with personal friendships and social life.Increases happiness.Further guidance – candidates are most likely to discuss consequences from Source 2 as listed above. However, the assessment is focused mainly upon their reasoning / justification and therefore additional points should be credited.
The following levels of response should be used to award marks. Level 3 (3 marks) Good response
Clearly reasoned explanation explicitly linked to a consequence with one developed point or three relevant but undeveloped points.
Level 2 (2 marks) Reasonable response
Some explanation with two (or more) undeveloped points. The link between the explanation and a consequence may be implicit / unclear at times. Level 1 (1 mark) Limited response
Limited explanation. Explanation is not linked to a consequence explicitly. Level 0 (0 marks)
No relevant response or creditworthy material.
1(d)[6]
Indicative content
Candidates are likely to identify the following personal causes:
Matching interests and values.Respect and praise from managers.Safe, secure and healthy working conditions/environment.Getting training and support.Feeling trusted.Being treated fairly.Having open and honest relationships.Candidates are likely to identify the following national causes:
Laws to ensure safe, secure and healthy working conditions.National training schemes to provide skills for jobs.Low taxation.3 marks are available for the explanation of each cause. A total of 6 marks (3 marks + 3 marks) are therefore available for the questions as a whole. The following levels of response should be used to award marks. Level 3 (3 marks) Good response
A clear and full explanation of the cause explicitly related to the context – personal or national.
Level 2 (2 marks) Reasonable response
A basic or partial explanation of the cause generally related to the context – personal or national.
Level 1 (1 mark) Limited response
An identification of a cause with limited or no explanation related to the context – personal or national.
Level 0 (0 marks)
No relevant response or creditworthy material.
Make a free account to save your answers and see your weak topics and ask the AI why a wrong answer is wrong.

